Guías clínicas de fractura de cadera. Comparación de sus principales recomendaciones / Hip Fracture Guidelines. A comparison of the main recommendations

La fractura de cadera es la complicación más grave de la osteoporosis, y a pesar de ser un problema de salud frecuente, existe una amplia variabilidad en la asistencia sanitaria que se presta a estos pacientes y en los resultados obtenidos tras su tratamiento. Las guías clínicas son instrumentos que ayudan a reducir esta variabilidad. Los autores de esta revisión pretenden dar una visión general y comparada de las principales recomendaciones que proponen las guías clínicas más importantes para el manejo hospitalario de los pacientes con fractura de cadera. Se revisan las recomendaciones de tratamiento en la fase aguda, concretamente sobre el manejo hospitalario inicial, el uso de instrumentaciones, las medidas de prevención de complicaciones médicas, aspectos relacionados con la intervención quirúrgica, el tratamiento de problemas habituales y la colaboración ortogeriátrica. La difusión y aplicación de las principales recomendaciones contribuirá a mejorar la atención sanitaria a estos pacientes y a obtener mejores resultados(AU)

Hip fracture is the most severe complication of osteoporosis, and despite being a frequent health problem, there is a wide variability in both the health care provided to these patients and the results achieved after their treatment. Clinical guidelines are a tool that helps to reduce this variability. The authors of this review try to give a panoramic and comparative view of the key recommendations proposed by the main guidelines for the hospital care of hip fracture patients. Recommendations on the care in the acute phase are reviewed, particularly the initial hospital management, use of tools, preventive measures to avoid medical complications, surgery related aspects, treatment of usual clinical problems, and shared orthopaedic and geriatric care. Circulating and putting into practice the main recommendations will help to improve the health care provided to these patients and obtain better outcomes(AU)

[Hip fracture guidelines. A comparison of the main recommendations]. / Guías clínicas de fractura de cadera. Comparación de sus principales recomendaciones.

Hip fracture is the most severe complication of osteoporosis, and despite being a frequent health problem, there is a wide variability in both the health care provided to these patients and the results achieved after their treatment. Clinical guidelines are a tool that helps to reduce this variability. The authors of this review try to give a panoramic and comparative view of the key recommendations proposed by the main guidelines for the hospital care of hip fracture patients. Recommendations on the care in the acute phase are reviewed, particularly the initial hospital management, use of tools, preventive measures to avoid medical complications, surgery related aspects, treatment of usual clinical problems, and shared orthopaedic and geriatric care. Circulating and putting into practice the main recommendations will help to improve the health care provided to these patients and obtain better outcomes.

Fragilidad y dependencia en Albacete (estudio FRADEA): razonamiento, diseño y metodología / Frailty and dependence in Albacete (FRADEA study): reasoning, design and methodology

Objetivo. Obtener una cohorte de sujetos con edad igual o mayor a 70 años, representativa de una población urbana española, para estimar la prevalencia de fragilidad y seguirla en el tiempo para analizar factores asociados. Material y métodos. Estudio de cohortes concurrente de base poblacional. Sobre un universo de 18.137 ancianos, se realizó un muestreo aleatorio estratificado para obtener una muestra representativa de 1.172. Aceptaron participar 993 personas (84,7%). Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas, de comorbilidad, funcionales (n=825), cognitivas, afectivas y de calidad de vida. A los sujetos que aceptaron se les determinó la composición corporal por bioimpedanciometría (n=557), el gasto energético basal por calorimetría indirecta (n=450) y se obtuvo muestra de sangre para la determinación de biomarcadores (n=859). La fragilidad se definió por la presencia de 3 o más de los criterios Fried: pérdida de peso no intencionada, baja fuerza, cansancio, lentitud al caminar y baja actividad física. La cohorte será seguida en el tiempo hasta el fallecimiento de los sujetos. Resultados. Edad media±desviación estándar 79,4±6,4 años, con 601 (60,5%) mujeres. Institucionalizados el 21,3%. Fueron frágiles el 16,9%, prefrágiles 48,5%, no frágiles 21,8%, y no se dispuso de 3 criterios para poder determinar su estado en el 12,8%, de los cuales el 9,5% tenía una discapacidad moderada-severa, por lo que la prevalencia de fragilidad podría aumentar hasta el 26,4%. Conclusiones. Se ha construido la cohorte FRADEA, representativa de los mayores de una población urbana de España. La prevalencia de fragilidad en la cohorte fue del 16,9%(AU)

Objective. To obtain a cohort of subjects of equal to or greater than 70 years, representative of a Spanish urban population, to estimate the prevalence of frailty and follow it up over time to analyse associated factors. Material and methods. A prospective, population-based cohort study. From a population of 18,137 elderly persons, a representative sample of 1172 was randomly stratified, of which 993 (84.7%) agreed to take part. The variables collected were; sociodemographic, comorbidity, functional (n=825), cognitive, affective and quality of life. On the patients who agreed, body composition was determined by bioimpedance analysis (n=557), basal metabolic rate by indirect calorimetry (n=450) and a blood sample was obtained for biomarkers (n=859). Frailty was defined by the presence of 3 or more Fried criteria: unintentional weight loss, low energy, exhaustion, slow walking, and low physical activity. The cohort will be followed up over time until the death of the subjects. Results. Mean age 79.4 (SD 6.4) years, with 601 (60.5%) women. A total of 21.3% were institutionalised; 16.9% were frail, 48.5% pre-frail, 21.3% non-frail, and 12.8% did not have the 3 criteria to be able to determine their state, of which 9.5% had moderate-severe incapacity, which would increase the prevalence of frailty to 26.4%. Conclusions. A FRADEA cohort has been constructed, representative of an urban population in Spain. The prevalence of frailty in the cohort was 16.9%(AU)

[Frailty and dependence in Albacete (FRADEA study): reasoning, design and methodology]. / Fragilidad y dependencia en Albacete (estudio FRADEA): razonamiento, diseño y metodología.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain a cohort of subjects of equal to or greater than 70 years, representative of a Spanish urban population, to estimate the prevalence of frailty and follow it up over time to analyse associated factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, population-based cohort study. From a population of 18,137 elderly persons, a representative sample of 1172 was randomly stratified, of which 993 (84.7%) agreed to take part. The variables collected were; sociodemographic, comorbidity, functional (n=825), cognitive, affective and quality of life. On the patients who agreed, body composition was determined by bioimpedance analysis (n=557), basal metabolic rate by indirect calorimetry (n=450) and a blood sample was obtained for biomarkers (n=859). Frailty was defined by the presence of 3 or more Fried criteria: unintentional weight loss, low energy, exhaustion, slow walking, and low physical activity. The cohort will be followed up over time until the death of the subjects. RESULTS: Mean age 79.4 (SD 6.4) years, with 601 (60.5%) women. A total of 21.3% were institutionalised; 16.9% were frail, 48.5% pre-frail, 21.3% non-frail, and 12.8% did not have the 3 criteria to be able to determine their state, of which 9.5% had moderate-severe incapacity, which would increase the prevalence of frailty to 26.4%. CONCLUSIONS: A FRADEA cohort has been constructed, representative of an urban population in Spain. The prevalence of frailty in the cohort was 16.9%.